How does the character of Willie Mossop develop through the course of the play Essay Example

How does the character of Willie Mossop develop through the course of the play Essay Willie Mossop is a shoe maker of a boot shop which is owned by Hobson. Hobson doesnt think much of Willie and he doesnt mind because he says, I am not ambitious that I know of. Willies character develops throughout the play from being a very poor unconfident man, to a rich and very confident man who is still humble and genuinely nice.As we enter the opening scene of the play we read that Hobson is nowhere to be seen indicating that he doesnt have anything to do with the running of his shop. His business is only successful because of Maggie who sells the boots very efficiently. We see evidence of that when she forces Albert to buy a pair of shoes when he comes to see Alice. When Hobson does finally enter the shop he gets very angry because he thinks that his daughters dont have the right attitude towards him saying they are uppish and dont act like proper women. This attitude of Hobsons changes immediately when Mrs. Hepworth enters his shop because she is a rich person and spends a lo t on shoes.She demands to see the maker of her boots and Willie is brought up to Mrs. Hepworth. She praises Willie to his face and says that if he ever leaves Hobsons he should go tell her so she can get her boots made by him. Hobson says, What does she want to praise a workman to his face for? We see that Hobson doesnt care much for, nor does he really appreciate, Willie and he doesnt realize how important Willie is to his business which he will regret later on.Hobson tells his daughters that he is going to choose husbands for them because they arent smart enough to do so by themselves. When he says that he excludes Maggie saying that she is already past marrying age which upsets Maggie, she decides that she should get a husband herself and get out of her life of misery. Maggie recognizes that Willie is her only way to get a life out of her present life and says to him, My brain and your hands ull make a working partnership. She asks him to marry her so that they can leave Hobsons and start their own shop.Maggie tells Willie to kiss her to seal their bond but Willie is too shy and runs into the cellar. At this point Maggies sisters enter and they say that youre mistaken if you think Ill own Willie Mossop for my brother-in-law. They say that he is too low class to join the family and that father wouldnt be happy about this. When Hobson enters the shop again and hears the news of Maggie and Willie he says that the only way to stop this marriage is too beat the love out of Willie. When Hobson strikes Willie, Willie is angered and takes Maggies hand. When Willie is hit again, Willie kisses Maggie and walks out of the shop with her.We see that Willie doesnt have much say in his marriage decision with Maggie but he would rather marry her than the girl he was tokened to because he was scared of her mother. This tells us that Willie isnt a very confident man but we also know that he is learning to be more confident when he leaves the shop with Maggie because Hobson h it him.When Willie and Maggie move out, Hobsons business begins to fail drastically. Alice and Vickey run the business and they make a mess of it because they dont have Maggies business intellect. When Maggie comes to the shop to invite her sisters to her wedding she tells them they have to accept Willie and kiss him to show it. After much protest they do kiss him and accept him as part of the family. They all go to their wedding and Maggie takes a brass ring for their marriage. Maggie still doesnt trust Willie enough thats why she doesnt give him the ring. Before they enter the church Maggie asks Willie if he actually loves her because she has respect for the church. Will says, Youre growing on me lass. Ill toe the line with you. This tells us that Willie now loves Maggie even though the marriage was originally a business agreement.Afterwards they all go to Willie and Maggies new house for the celebration. Maggie has been training Willie too read and write and he gives a wonderful speech to all of them which shocks them. Willies confidence has grown and you can tell that as he speaks directly to Maggie and he stops addressing Vicky and Alice as Miss. However, he still doesnt feel comfortable at being left alone with Maggie on their wedding night because he doesnt know what will happen. Hobson enters as Willies guests are about to leave and they have to hide and stay inside Willies house. This is a big moment in Willies character change as he talks directly to his old master as the new master of his own house. Aye, let him come inHobson has problems he needs to settle and wants to talk to Maggie about it. She says that Willie is her husband and if Hobson wants to talk he has to talk to both of them. This shows us that Maggie is making Willie an equal to Hobson by making Hobson have to talk to Willie and Maggie together.At the end of the play, a year later, when Maggie and Willie hear of Hobsons breakdown, they go to see how he is. Alice and Vickey are also the re to see their father but are more interested in his will. Willie talks directly and with a strong voice to Alice and Vickey stating he is an equal or even of higher status then them. Ill do the arranging, Alice. If we come here, we come here on my terms. Willie also brings Hobson down to earth about his business and offers him a partnership. Hobson tries to offer Willie his old job back but Willie says weve paid off Mrs. Hepworths loan and made a bit of brass on top of that. Willie has taken all of the high class customers from Hobson. Hobson is forced to agree as he doesnt have any other choice except Hobsons Choice referring to the title as he has only one choice which he has to take. Willie even stands up to Maggie when they are deciding on the name of the shop, Mossop or Hobson or its Oldfield Road for us, Maggie. Maggie gives in knowing that Willie has grown since their marriage and is now an equal to Maggie.Willie has transformed since he started to work. He has grown in con fidence yet still has held his humility as he agreed to have a partnership with Hobson and not leave him in his hour of need. Willie criticizes himself for being to harsh on Hobson but he is told he has done the right thing. Maggie and Willie are equal now and both take part equally in making decisions and Maggie now loves him more than she did when she originally saw him as a business opportunity. Willie also starts loving Maggie and they have combined marriage and business very well into a working partnership. I think Willie has grown well throughout the play. He stood up for himself at times when he needed to most and never grew arrogant and held his honesty, integrity and genuine warmth and caring.

Abortion8 essays

Abortion8 essays No one has the right to choose what is wrongAbraham Lincoln. Abortion is one of the most highly debated issues of our time. Several questions arise from the midst of this multi-faceted jumble of opinions, morals, and strongly held values. When does the fetus become a person, as opposed to a mass of tissue? Is abortion acceptable in some circumstances while not in others? These are points I will strive to clarify, and share my thoughts and beliefs on. My beliefs, briefly outlined, are as follows: a baby is a baby at the time of conception. It has all the rights of a child outside of the womb-including the right to live. Why do I believe that an unborn baby is a person? In the split second that sperm and egg unite to create a zygote, genetic codes are formed. These codes dictate a persons height, hair colour, eye colour, and even many personality traits. The blueprint for a human that will eventually be made up of over 64 trillion cells, all contained in a package no bigger than the point of a pin. Unborn babies are de-humanized by pro-choice activists. They use euphemisms to make the brutal dismemberment and killing of a human baby into termination of fetus. Try to find a pro-choice pamphlet that uses the word baby or person to describe what is being removed. The baby is often described as being merely tissue. Lets examine the reality of saying that a fetus is not alive. Sex can be determined in a preborn 3-7 days after fertilization. (Dr Jerome Lejeune M.D.) The human heart beats at 21 days. (Dr. William Liley, Foetologist) At 8 weeks a preborn is sensitive to touch and pain. (Human Development Resource Council Inc., 1996) Brain waves have been recorded in as early as 37 days. (Dr. William Liley, Foetologist) Fingerprints are detectable in preborns at 10 weeks. (Human Development Resource Council Inc., 1996) It has been found that fetal heart rate slows ...

Green House Emission Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Green House Emission - Essay Example He has connected rise in population with the exploitation of resources. This has been stated as the core reason in the deterioration in the quality of the commons. All the other agents which affect the common resources are resultants of population explosion. Taking this approach into account, the arguments of Garret Hardin are holistic in terms of suggesting solutions in the management of the commons. The core argument that the paper makes is that there is no technical solution possible towards the problem of population. There are limitations to bringing in regulations to the rights of people in terms of utilizing resources. According to the author, what is important is to have mutually agreed understandings so that the limits of exploitation are maintained. The author begins the article by citing various proofs to the argument that technical solutions never solve certain problems. The thesis of the article is that the population problem is a task without a technical solution. The pe ripheral solution sought to tackle this problem has been thoroughly criticized by the author. He has quoted innovations like high yielding varieties of crops and large scale fishing as examples of technologies which was intended to cater for the increasing population but failed to do so. The gradual process of boundaries being created on the use of farmland and other resources has been described. The author refers to pollution as the counter reaction of over population. The arguments posed by the author are convincing as the observations made by him are proving to be true after more than forty years. It must be noted here that the article was written in 1968. The aftermaths of overexploitation of resources were not evidently observable in that period. Thus, in the event of climate change and all the other impacts caused on the environment due to overexploitation of resources, it can be stated that the author could foresee all that. It has been reported that as a consequence of over exploitation of resources, many mountain glaciers will be gone by mid-century; Glacier National Park, for example, will be likely to lose its glaciers by 2030 (Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Part 2, 2011) The basic thesis of the article is that the problem of population has relations with the freedom of breeding. Thus, the choice of people to have control over the usage of resources is the most feasible solution towards the equitable sharing of resources. A sense of mutual coercion has been recommended by the author in order to define to breed or not to breed. The decision to breed lies in the context of utilization of resources, in other terms, the decision to set one’s own limit in utilizing the resources of the nature. According to the author, it is the self-control which would regulate people in judicious use of common resources. The author has cited the case of cattle grazing on a pasture to explain this. Ideally, this is the right mechanism possible to regulate a community to maintain ethical boundaries. However, in the diverse and complicated social and economic setup of today’s world this policy may not be easy to follow. The basic issue here is that ethical understanding of various communities and regions towards the nature and optimal exploration of resources differs largely. It must be interesting to quote here that there are communities in the world which take a divine approach towards nature and use its resources with utmost care and

History of ECON 4 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

History of ECON 4 - Essay Example Social wealth comes from the production of economic goods in a capitalist economy (Heilbroner, 168). Organization of economic activities leads to division of labor among individuals. The division of labor and the economic organization meets the material needs of the society, which creates social wealth. Max argues that production is done for producing exchange value, but the benefits do not last. Max argues that capitalist economies buy labor with money because production is an important part of the development. Labor power is a special kind of commodity because it involves the special kind of abilities of human beings. Labor is a special kind of commodity because individuals should be willing to sell their labor power. Max argues that individuals and employers should meet in the marketplace as equals. Employers should be able to put his employees in the position of a buyer’s disposal. It indicates that the laborer distances him or her from labor to be able to claim rights it rights. Labor is a special kind of commodity because individuals should not sell the labor he has created (Heilbroner, 169). The individual should sell the labor power because they do not own the means of production. Max argues that some people own the money while some individuals own labor power. It is the reason labor power is a special kind of commodity. Labor power exists in the capacity of a living person. According to Karl Max, interpretation of the increase in the population is in the context of a capitalistic fiscal system. He argues that a capitalist takes a huge role in the economic sense. He feels that offer capitalist labor relative trivial share of labor productivity. Capitalist introduce more machinery in the society to increase the value of surplus of labor efficiency. According to Max introduction of machinery, creates a surplus of individuals due to lack of jobs to create balance in the economy (Heilbroner, 170). The population is a result

Answer at least 5 queations thoroughly Assignment

Answer at least 5 queations thoroughly - Assignment Example However, caution adherence is paramount when using the traits to measure origins because characteristics of men and women are different. Also, mixed ancestry may cause complications. Metric traits are sex and age discriminatory while non-metric traits are mainly age discriminatory. Conclusively non-metric traits appear to be less discriminative and are more applicable. Apes have no tails; they are large and cumbersome; the body posture is upright, and the ratio of their brains to their body is bigger than the monkeys. Monkeys have tails, smaller body sizes with relatively equal hind limbs and forelimbs order (Walker and Suzanne 178). Primate is in two groups the Prosimians and anthropoids (simians). Monkey and apes fall under simians. Primate sub-orders Strepsirrhini, (wet-nosed primates), consisting of non-tarsier prosimians, and the suborder Haplorhini (dry-nosed primates), composed of tarsiers and the simians. Simians are sub-divided into catarrhine (narrow-nosed) and platyrrhine ("flat-nosed"). Catarrhine include great apes, baboons and macaques (old world monkey) while platyrrhine (New World monkeys) squirrel, howler and the capuchin. Monkeys and apes have certain similar features which they with the other primates, such features include climbing trees, movement skills like jumping from tree to tree. They all walk on two or four legs and swaying amid branches (Walker and Suzanne 226). The primates have only a pair of mammary glands, heterodyne dentition, and all have fingernails. Monkey and apes differ from other primates with their larger body sizes, condensed dependence on sense of smell, less specified color vision. They have a bony plate that forms back of the eye socket and merging two edges of maxilla at midline forms one bone. Finally, they have longer gestation and development stages. Primates have some common characteristics like

Theological Reflection Approach on Practice

Theological Reflection Approach on Practice A written reflection on practice (1,500 words) Rational of the Theological Reflection Approach I have decided to use the Imagination and Spiritual Wisdom approach to this theological reflection because it allows for a deep understanding of the experience and the feelings involved. Then it progresses into creating an image from those feelings and by questioning the image we may develop an insight to what was really happening and use theology to help us to understand this insight. Thus, leading to action or an understanding of future actions in similar events.[1] Thick Description Someone in the church (A) was organising a surprise party for the vicar and his wife (VW) for their 25th wedding anniversary with permission from the rest of the family. They were organising it as a friend and not as a member of the congregation and therefore it was a non-church event. It was mentioned to people in the church as they would obviously be invited as friends of the couple. There was an element of tension between certain members of the congregation as they felt that it should have been done through church and this was expressed to the church wardens, who had also been asked to help with the party, and A. This led to a disagreement between A and another member of the congregation (B) one Sunday morning before the service. This was witnessed by a few people although they could not hear what was being said. It did however turn out that this issue was resolved quickly once tensions had calmed down. The pastoral situation came from someone (J) who had witnessed this altercation. J has been a member of the congregation for many years and has developed a close pastoral relationship with the vicar and his wife and the member of the congregation. She was concerned about how B had be treated through this situation. Over the course of the week various messages had been sent via social media between A, J and various others in the congregation about this altercation, the party in general and views about it. The messages had become somewhat hurtful and not appropriate. J had become quite upset about it and went to speak to the VW to ask if A would stop sending messages to her. J did say that she could not go into detail about the messages and why they had started in the first place as she did not want to spoil the surprise. It transpires that the messages continued to be sent with A convinced that the surprise had be spoiled and was placing the blame towards J. Due to wanting to keep the surprise J contacted myself. I met with J on a Friday evening in church with most of the meeting explaining what had transpired over the past week. J was very agitated and angry about what was happening in terms of the messages. I allowed her to speak and reassured her that I was listening to what was being said but clear that I was not agreeing with her opinion about A although was sympathetic towards her feelings about what had happened. I was also aware that J did not like A but the reason for this was unknown to me. Others had also noticed this dislike and I mentioned this to J. I also pointed out that A was a liked person and people were viewing Js actions as not very nice. J took exception to this comment and defended what she had said and done by saying that something had happened with A in a previous church that none of us were aware of. The meeting concluded with a decision that I would speak to A and ask for the messages to stop, that I would reassure A also that J had not spoiled the surprise, J agreed that she would not respond to any messages that were sent to her in regards to the party or anything else along similar lines. We finished by praying and J thanked me for listening. Feelings 2.1 Reflections on Personal Feelings of the Situation Personally, the whole situation felt a little petty and had no feelings towards this situation and felt that this could be sorted out. Yet I was aware there would need to be further reconciliation of J and A as feelings ran deep of dislike towards each other. 2.2 Reflection on Js Feelings of the Situation The feelings that were clearly visible by J in this situation were: Anger towards A because of the altercation with B Frustration asked for the messages to stop and they had continued Shock she had been challenged over her attitude towards A Power knew information that no one else knew about A When reflecting on these feelings being displayed I felt that the underlying elements to all of this was a sense of jealousy towards A and the VWs newly formed friendship and therefore an element of displacement by J in her relationship, which was ultimately a pastoral one, with VW. Image Based on the feelings mentioned above the image that comes to mind is: This image shows the child-like nature of the situation (the messages sent via social media), the exclusion or perceived exclusion of one from a group, and finally the two who have paired off not being aware of the person or the feelings of the person who has been excluded. Theology 4.1 Biblical Passages The biblical passages that reflect jealousy which could speak into this situation are: Genesis 37 Joseph and his brothers being jealous of his relationship with their father. Proverbs 27.4 Anger is cruel and fury overwhelming, but who can stand against jealousy? Luke 10.38-42 Mary and Martha being with Jesus Genesis 4 Cain and Abel and the jealousy of how God favoured them Mark 10:35-45 James and John asking to sit at the right and left hand of Jesus and the reaction of the rest of the disciples Reflections on the Biblical Passage Genesis 37 The passage that I felt reflected this situation the best was of Joseph and his brothers being jealous. Joseph receiving his coat from Jacob is a sign of love towards his son to the exclusion of the other sons/brothers. The brothers reaction to this situation was one that led to Joseph being separated from his family as they sold him to be a slave. The brothers reaction could not be hidden within them but was publicly acknowledged between them and towards Joseph himself with a lack of greeting or salutation.[2] The selling of Joseph should not have happened, and was not actually planned but the opportunistic nature of the brothers, brought a situation to pass which ultimately was used by God for a greater purpose (Gen. 50.20). The hatching of a plan to tell Jacob about the death of Joseph had wider issues for the brother as their fathers grief was great. [3] The brothers jealousy led to the pain of Joseph as a slave and then in prison. The pain of Jacob in the act of grief over Joseph, the story does not tell us of the life of the brothers and Jacob but the grief would have been a long running issue within the house hold. The brothers had to live with knowing that they had caused this grief. Parallels between the Thick Description and Biblical Passage If the people in the thick description were the biblical characters it would be: A was Joseph, J was the brothers, VW was Jacob and to an extent I was the caravan of Ishmaelites. Js jealousy of A was great and in effect trying to sell A to me as someone who was of no value and a trouble maker. Reflecting on this now I could see that if this was to carry on then there could be great pain for VW in the long term and then the ripple effect of this amongst the church community. New Insights and Action Reflecting on the theology of Joseph and this pastoral care situation I would have addressed it in the following way: Not challenged Js behaviour towards A in the initial instance. I should have listened to the problem that was being raised and dealt with that in the way that I did. I would have then arranged another meeting with J to discuss her behaviour and attitude towards A. In a follow up pastoral care situation I would have addressed the feelings of J towards the relationship between A and VW. I would have asked her to share how seeing the relationship form made her feel and why she felt that this might be an issue. Hopefully over time she would have seen her jealousy was not necessarily something that should have been an issue. This may have taken a few pastoral encounters to come to a conclusion. There may have also been a need for a time of reconciliation between J and A and also a session between J, A and VW to discuss the feelings between the three of them. I would have been a good person to facilitate this as I was neutral in the situation and had a relationship with the people involved where there could be honesty and openness. Word Count: 1563 Appendix 1 This situation was part of a larger situation that soon unravelled within the church community so the new actions and insights are speculative as to how I would have handled the situation if it had continued. Bibliography Killen, Patricia OConnell, and John De Beer, The Art Of Theological Reflection, 1st edn (New York: Crossroad, 2014) Longman, Tremper, How To Read Genesis, 1st edn (Downers Grove, Ill.: Authentic Media, 2005) Mounce, William D, The Crossway Comprehensive Concordance Of The Holy Bible, 1st edn (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 2002) Thompson, Judith, Stephen Pattison, and Ross Thompson, SCM Studyguide To Theological Reflection, 1st edn (London: SCM Press, 2008) UpChurch, John, and Association Counselors, Genesis 37:4 Commentary John Gills Exposition Of The Bible, Bible Study Tools,2017 [accessed 17 March 2017] [1] Killen and Beer, The Art of Theological Reflection, p. 21 [2] UpChurch, Exposition of the Bible, [3] Longman, How to Read Genesis, p.151

The Sedition Act of 1798 :: history

The Sedition Act of 1798 For the first few years of Constitutional government, under the leadership of George Washington, there was a unity, commonly called Federalism that even James Madison (the future architect of the Republican Party) acknowledged in describing the Republican form of government-- à ¿ And according to the degree of pleasure and pride we feel in being republicans, ought to be our zeal in cherishing the spirit and supporting the character of Federalists.à ¿ Although legislators had serious differences of opinions, political unity was considered absolutely essential for the stability of the nation. Political parties or factions were considered evil as à ¿Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majorityà ¿Ãƒ ¿ Public perception of factions were related to British excesses and thought to be à ¿the mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished.à ¿ James Madison wrote in Federalist Papers #10, à ¿By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.à ¿ He went on to explain that faction is part of human nature; à ¿that the CAUSES of faction cannot be removed, and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its EFFECTS.à ¿ The significant point Madison was to make in this essay was that the Union was a safeguard against factions in that even if à ¿the influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular States, [they will be] unable to spread a general conflagration through the other States.à ¿ What caused men like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison to defy tradition and public perceptions against factions and build an opposition party? Did they finally agree with Edmund Burkesà ¿ famous aphorism: à ¿When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle?à ¿ Did the answer lie in their opposition with the agenda of Alexander Hamilton and the The Sedition Act of 1798 :: history The Sedition Act of 1798 For the first few years of Constitutional government, under the leadership of George Washington, there was a unity, commonly called Federalism that even James Madison (the future architect of the Republican Party) acknowledged in describing the Republican form of government-- à ¿ And according to the degree of pleasure and pride we feel in being republicans, ought to be our zeal in cherishing the spirit and supporting the character of Federalists.à ¿ Although legislators had serious differences of opinions, political unity was considered absolutely essential for the stability of the nation. Political parties or factions were considered evil as à ¿Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majorityà ¿Ãƒ ¿ Public perception of factions were related to British excesses and thought to be à ¿the mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished.à ¿ James Madison wrote in Federalist Papers #10, à ¿By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.à ¿ He went on to explain that faction is part of human nature; à ¿that the CAUSES of faction cannot be removed, and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its EFFECTS.à ¿ The significant point Madison was to make in this essay was that the Union was a safeguard against factions in that even if à ¿the influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular States, [they will be] unable to spread a general conflagration through the other States.à ¿ What caused men like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison to defy tradition and public perceptions against factions and build an opposition party? Did they finally agree with Edmund Burkesà ¿ famous aphorism: à ¿When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle?à ¿ Did the answer lie in their opposition with the agenda of Alexander Hamilton and the